robert-sapolsky

robert-sapolsky

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bnSY4L3V8s

  • Need to think more about what this video says.
  • On the surface, it validates a lot of my suspicions around genes being incredibly susceptible to environmental forces, and childhood experiences informing adult behavior by modifying our brain, neurology and hormonal makeup.
    • These became super apparent to me personally as an immigrant, moving from one culture that I was primally adapted to (if not intellectually) to one that was very viscerally unfamiliar despite being exposed to the superficial aspects of it all my life. I wonder how much this has to do with my own thought patterns and issues I struggle with
  • How true are the claims in this video?
  • Humans - conflicting history with acts of aggression

  • Amygdala regulates aggression? Amygdala regulates fear

    • You can’t make sense of neurobiology of aggression without considering the neurobiology of fear
    • Amygdala gets rapid and privileged sensory information that’s often innacurate due to speed
  • Insula Cortex

    • Regulates disgust - handles ingestion of toxic food
      • Also regulates imaginatio of these things
    • BUt it also regulates moral disgust - “stomach lurching” at moral transgression
    • Obviously, this is intensely context dependent
    • Insula is central to human tendency to consider what is different, to be wrong, and tell amygdala about it
  • Dopamine is about reward, but even more so about the anticipation of reward
    • Gets heavily activated when uncertainy/intermittency is introduced in the system of rewards
    • Few things activate the dopamine system than the prospect of righteous punishment
  • Fusiform cortex - recognizes faces

  • Anterior singulate - empathy

  • Low blood sugar can affect the performance of the frontal cortex

  • Testosterone

    • How does it work alongside aggression

    • Doesn’t invent new patterns of aggression

    • It amplifies existing patterns and lowers the threshold for triggers

    • John Wingfield - challenge hypothesis

    • Testosterone - when you’re challenged, it makes you do whatever you need to in order to hold on to status

      • Sometimes status is gained by altruism - explains other status-regulating behavior
  • Oxytocin

    • Promotes mother-infant bonding, pair-bonds in monogamous relationships
    • Trust, expressibility - promotes prosocial behavior?
    • Actually no. It makes us prosocial to people who count as ‘us’
      • Makes us pre-emptively xenophonic
  • Epigenetics - childhood experiences can turn certain genes on or off, leaving an imprint on your DNA
  • Geography vs culture
    • Desert dwellers more likely to create monotheistic religions
    • Favor warfare
    • Rainforest dwellers more likely to create polytheistic religions
    • More egalitarian
  • Individual selection - optimize for your own reproductive success (genghis khan?)
  • Kin selection - invest in the success of those close to us/related to us
  • Reciprocal Altruism - Optimize for cooperation with other people